Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 1.128
1.
Nursing ; 54(5): 56-61, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640037

ABSTRACT: A strong link exists between adequate supply chain management and nurse efficiency and satisfaction. Implementing Lean methodology, specifically 5S process improvement, staff created a unit-based supply room that was clean, safe, and well organized which led to reduced waste, greater efficiency, and cost savings.


Efficiency, Organizational , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital , Humans , Cost Savings/methods , Quality Improvement
2.
J Med Econ ; 26(1): 760-768, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37249124

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the potential cost-savings for implementing continuous vital sign monitoring in a hospital's medical-surgical units. METHODS: A cost-savings analysis was designed to calculate potential cost-savings for an average-sized U.S. community hospital (153 total beds) over a 1-year time horizon. Analysis parameters were extracted from national databases and previous studies that compared outcomes for patients receiving continuous vital sign monitoring (SpO2, HR, and RR) or standard of care (intermittent vital sign measurements) in medical-surgical units based on a targeted literature review. Clinical parameters and associated costs served as analysis inputs. The analysis outputs were costs and potential cost-savings using a 50% and 100% adoption rate of continuous monitoring technologies across the medical-surgical unit. RESULTS: Potential annual cost-savings for in-hospital medical-surgical stays were estimated at $3,414,709 (2022 USD) and $6,829,418 for a 50% and 100% adoption rate, respectively. The cost-savings for an adoption rate of 100% equated to a ∼14% reduction in the overall annual cost of medical-surgical unit stays for an average-sized hospital. The largest contribution to potential cost-savings came from patients that avoided serious adverse events that require transfer to the intensive care unit; this resulted in annual cost-savings from reduced average length of stay between $1,756,613 and $3,513,226 (50% and 100% adoption rate, respectively). Additional cost-savings can be attained from reductions in in-hospital cardiac arrest-associated hospitalizations and decreased rapid response team activation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that there is the potential for cost-savings of over $6.8 million dollars per year in an average-sized US community hospital by improving patient outcomes through implementation of continuous monitoring technologies in medical-surgical units. Continuous vital sign monitoring technologies that increase patient mobility and facilitate recovery may further contribute to cost-savings and should be considered for economic analyses. Future research is needed to explore these health-related outcomes.


Hospitalization , Intensive Care Units , Humans , Cost Savings/methods , Length of Stay , Vital Signs
3.
JAMA Health Forum ; 3(9): e223398, 2022 09 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36218951

Importance: The Medicare Shared Savings Program provides financial incentives for accountable care organizations (ACOs) to reduce costs of care. The structure of the shared savings program may not adequately adjust for challenges associated with caring for patients with high medical complexity and social needs, a population disproportionately made up of racial and ethnic minority groups. If so, ACOs serving racial and ethnic minority groups may be more likely to exit the program, raising concerns about the equitable distribution of potential benefits from health care delivery reform efforts. Objective: To evaluate whether ACOs with a high proportion of beneficaries of racial and ethnic minority groups are more likely to exit the Medicare Shared Savings Program and identify characteristics associated with this disparity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational cohort study used secondary data on Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs from January 2012 through December 2018. Bivariate and multivariate cross-sectional regression analyses were used to understand whether ACO racial and ethnic composition was associated with program exit, and how ACOs with a high proportion of beneficaries of racial and ethnic minority groups differed in characteristics associated with program exit. Exposures: Racial and ethnic composition of an ACO's beneficiaries. Main Outcomes and Measures: Shared savings program exit before 2018. Results: The study included 589 Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs. The ACOs in the highest quartile of proportion of beneficaries of racial and ethnic minority groups were designated high-proportion ACOs (145 [25%]), and those in the lowest 3 quartiles were designated low-proportion ACOs (444 [75%]). In unadjusted analysis, a 10-percentage point increase in the proportion of beneficiaries of racial and ethnic minority groups was associated with a 1.12-fold increase in the odds of an ACO exit (95% CI, 1.00-1.25; P = .04). In adjusted analysis, there were significant associations among high-proportion ACOs between characteristics such as patient comorbidities, disability, and clinician composition and a higher likelihood of exit. Conclusions and Relevance: The study results suggest that ACOs that served a higher proportion of beneficaries of racial and ethnic minority groups were more likely to exit the Medicare Shared Savings Program, partially because of serving patients with greater disease severity and complexity. These findings raise concerns about how current payment reform efforts may differentially affect racial and ethnic minority groups.


Accountable Care Organizations , Aged , Cost Savings/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnic and Racial Minorities , Ethnicity , Humans , Medicare , Minority Groups , Retrospective Studies , United States
4.
J Trauma Nurs ; 29(5): 272-277, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36095275

BACKGROUND: Trauma centers are required to have immediate availability of resources to stabilize traumatic injuries. However, maintaining trauma room organization can be challenging in the fast turnaround environment of trauma care. Implementation of 5S methodology has shown success in standardizing processes to maintain organized, efficient workspaces. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of 5S methodology on trauma resuscitation room organization, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This quality improvement pre- and postintervention study assessed the impact of 5S methodology on trauma resuscitation room organization. A 20-question survey was developed and administered to emergency department technicians before and after a multiphase intervention that included strategies for room reorganization, improved signage, creation of workstations, education, and implementation of a log sheet system. A final cost analysis was evaluated upon completion. RESULTS: Emergency department technicians completed n = 26 presurveys and n = 19 postsurveys. Room organization improved from preintervention 31% to postintervention 89%. Restocking with a checklist improved from 46% preintervention to 63% postintervention. A cost analysis summary identified 130 overstocked items equaling a total cost savings of $4,026.82. CONCLUSION: The 5S methodology improved trauma bay organization by sorting, organizing, standardizing, labeling, and color coding resuscitation supplies based on the ABCDE (airway, breathing, circulation, disability, and exposure) of the primary survey. Additional strategies included improved signage, workspace reorganization, staff education, and checklist restocking accountability. The 5S implementation resulted in significant cost savings.


Quality Improvement , Trauma Centers , Cost Savings/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Resuscitation
5.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0272706, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35960735

The COVID pandemic disrupted health care spending and utilization, and the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), Medicare's largest value-based payment model with 11.2 million assigned beneficiaries, was no exception. Despite COVID, the 513 accountable care organizations (ACO) in MSSP returned a program record $1.9 billion in net savings to Medicare in 2020. To understand the extent of COVID's impact on MSSP cost and quality, we describe how ACO spending changed in 2020 and further analyze changes in measured quality and utilization. We found that non-COVID per capita spending in MSSP fell by 8.3 percent from $11,496 to $10,537 (95% confidence interval(CI),-1,223.8 to-695.4, p<0.001), driven by 14.6% and 7.5% reductions in per capita acute inpatient and outpatient spending, respectively. Utilization fell across inpatient, emergency, and outpatient settings. On quality metrics, preventive screening rates remained stable or improved, while control of diabetes and blood pressure worsened. Large reductions in non-COVID utilization helped ACOs succeed financially in 2020, but worsening chronic disease measures are concerning. The appropriateness of the benchmark methodology and exclusion of COVID-related spending, especially as the virus approaches endemicity, should be revisited to ensure bonus payments reflect advances in care delivery and health outcomes rather than COVID-related shifts in spending and utilization patterns.


Accountable Care Organizations , COVID-19 , Aged , Benchmarking , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cost Savings/methods , Humans , Medicare , Pandemics , United States/epidemiology
6.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263054, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35113881

Hypothermia is a common adverse event during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), affecting multiple organ systems and increasing risk of poor health outcomes among patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing CRRT. TheraMax blood warmers are the next generation of extracorporeal blood warmers which reduce risk of hypothermia during CRRT. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the potential health economic impacts of avoiding CRRT-induced hypothermia by using the novel TherMax blood warming device. This study compares health care costs associated with use of the new TherMax blood warmer unit integrated with the PrisMax system compared to CRRT with a standalone blood warming device to avoid hypothermia in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). An economic model was developed in which relevant health states for each intervention were normothermia, hypothermia, discharge, and death. Clinical inputs and costs were obtained from a combination of retrospective chart review and publicly available summary estimates. The proportion of AKI patients treated with CRRT who became hypothermic (<36°C) during CRRT treatment was 34.5% in the TherMax group compared to 71.9% in the 'standalone warmer' group. Given the 78.7-year average life expectancy in the US and the assumed average patient age at discharge/death of 65.4 years, the total life-years gained by avoiding mortality related to hypothermia was 9.0 in the TherMax group compared to 8.0 in the 'standalone warmer' group. Cost per life-year gained was $8,615 in the TherMax group versus $10,115 in the 'standalone warmer' group for a difference of -$1,501 favoring TherMax. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was negative, indicating superior cost-effectiveness for TherMax versus 'standalone warmer'. The TherMax blood warming device used with the PrisMax system is associated with lower risk of hypothermia, which our model indicates leads to lower costs, lower risk of mortality due to hypothermia, and superior cost-effectiveness.


Acute Kidney Injury/economics , Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy/economics , Cost Savings/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Hypothermia, Induced/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Aged , Female , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Male , Retrospective Studies
7.
Thromb Haemost ; 122(3): 427-433, 2022 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34041736

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism constitutes substantial health care costs amounting to approximately 60 million euros per year in the Netherlands. Compared with initial hospitalization, home treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a cost reduction. An accurate estimation of cost savings per patient treated at home is currently lacking. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare health care utilization and costs during the first 3 months after a PE diagnosis in patients who are treated at home versus those who are initially hospitalized. METHODS: Patient-level data of the YEARS cohort study, including 383 normotensive patients diagnosed with PE, were used to estimate the proportion of patients treated at home, mean hospitalization duration in those who were hospitalized, and rates of PE-related readmissions and complications. To correct for baseline differences within the two groups, regression analyses was performed. The primary outcome was the average total health care costs during a 3-month follow-up period for patients initially treated at home or in hospital. RESULTS: Mean hospitalization duration for the initial treatment was 0.69 days for those treated initially at home (n = 181) and 4.3 days for those initially treated in hospital (n = 202). Total average costs per hospitalized patient were €3,209 and €1,512 per patient treated at home. The adjusted mean difference was €1,483 (95% confidence interval: €1,181-1,784). CONCLUSION: Home treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE was associated with an estimated net cost reduction of €1,483 per patient. This difference underlines the advantage of triage-based home treatment of these patients.


Home Care Services , Hospitalization , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Embolism , Triage , Venous Thromboembolism/complications , Cost Savings/methods , Duration of Therapy , Female , Health Care Costs/classification , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hemodynamics , Home Care Services/economics , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/physiopathology , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Triage/methods , Triage/standards
8.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 103(22): 2133-2140, 2021 11 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34424868

BACKGROUND: Health-care expenditures in the U.S. are continually rising, prompting providers, patients, and payers to search for solutions to reduce costs while maintaining quality. The present study seeks to define the out-of-pocket price that patients undergoing hand surgery are willing to pay, and also queries the potential cost-cutting measures that patients are most and least comfortable with. We hypothesized that respondents would be less accepting of higher out-of-pocket costs. METHODS: A survey was developed and distributed to paid, anonymous respondents through Amazon Mechanical Turk. The survey introduced 3 procedures: carpal tunnel release, cubital tunnel release, and open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radial fracture. Respondents were randomized to 1 of 5 out-of-pocket price options for each procedure and asked if they would pay that price. Respondents were then presented with various cost-saving methods and asked to select the options that made them most uncomfortable, even if those would save them out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: There were 1,408 respondents with a mean age of 37 years (range, 18 to 74 years). Nearly 80% of respondents were willing to pay for all 3 of the procedures regardless of which price they were presented. Carpal tunnel release was the most price-sensitive, with rejection rates of 17% at the highest price ($3,000) and 6% at the lowest ($250). Open reduction and internal fixation was the least price-sensitive, with rejection rates of 11% and 6% at the highest and lowest price, respectively. The use of older-generation implants was the least acceptable cost-cutting measure, at 50% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that most patients are willing to pay a considerable amount of money out of pocket for hand surgery after the condition, treatment, and outcomes are explained to them. Furthermore, respondents are hesitant to sacrifice advanced technology despite increased costs.


Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Hand/surgery , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Procedures/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Consumer Behavior/economics , Cost Savings/methods , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
9.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ; 19(1): 67, 2021 May 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941208

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide valuable insight on patients' well-being and facilitates communication between healthcare providers and their patients. The increased integration of the technology within the healthcare setting presents the opportunity to collect PROMs electronically, rather than on paper. The Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and Quality of My Life (QoML) are common PROMs collected from pediatric rheumatology patients. The objectives of this study are to (a) determine the equivalence of the paper and electronic forms (e-form) of CHAQ and QoML questionnaires; (b) identify potential benefits and barriers associated with using an e-form to capture PROMs; and (c) gather feedback on user experience. METHODS: Participants completed both a paper and an e-form of the questionnaires in a randomized order, following which they completed a feedback survey. Agreement of the scores between the forms were statistically analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (95 % Confidence Interval (CI)) and bias was assessed using a Bland-Altman plot. Completion and processing times of the forms were compared using mean and median measures. Quantitative analysis was performed to assess user experience ratings, while comments were qualitatively analyzed to identify important themes. RESULTS: 196 patients participated in this project. Scores on the forms had high ICC agreement > 0.9. New patients took longer than returning patients to complete the forms. Overall, the e-form was completed and processed in a shorter amount of time than the paper form. 83 % of survey respondents indicated that they either preferred the e-form or had no preference. Approximately 10 % of respondents suggested improvements to improve the user interface. CONCLUSIONS: E-forms collect comparable information in an efficient manner to paper forms. Given that patients and caregivers indicated they preferred completing PROMs in this manner, we will implement their suggested changes and incorporate e-forms as standard practice for PROMs collection in our pediatric rheumatology clinic.


Electronic Data Processing/methods , Electronic Health Records , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life , Rheumatology , Canada/epidemiology , Cost Savings/methods , Data Collection/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Program Evaluation , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Rheumatology/economics , Rheumatology/methods , Rheumatology/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
J Clin Neurosci ; 87: 112-115, 2021 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33863517

The study objective was to evaluate a single institution experience with adult stereotactic intracranial biopsies and review any projected cost savings as a result of bypassing intensive care unit (ICU) admission and limited routine head computed tomography (CT). The authors retrospectively reviewed all stereotactic intracranial biopsies performed at a single institution between February 2012 and March 2019. Primary data collection included ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, ICU interventions, need for reoperation, and CT use. Secondarily, location of lesion, postoperative hematoma, neurological deficit, pathology, and preoperative coagulopathy data were collected. There were 97 biopsy cases (63% male). Average age, ICU LOS, and total hospital stay were 58.9 years (range; 21-92 years), 2.3 days (range; 0-40 days), and 8.8 days (range 1-115 days), respectively. Seventy-five (75 of 97) patients received a postoperative head CT. No patients required medical or surgical intervention for complications related to biopsy. Eight patients required transfer from the ward to the ICU (none directly related to biopsy). Nine patients transferred directly to the ward postoperatively (none required transfer to ICU). Of the patients who did not receive CT or went directly to the ward, none had extended LOS or required transfer to ICU for neurosurgical concerns. Eliminating routine head CT and ICU admission translates to approximately $584,971 in direct cost savings in 89 cases without a postoperative ICU requirement. These practice changes would save patients' significant hospitalization costs, decrease healthcare expenditures, and allow for more appropriate hospital resource use.


Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Cost Savings/methods , Health Care Costs , Neuronavigation/methods , Patient Safety , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy/adverse effects , Biopsy/economics , Biopsy/methods , Brain Neoplasms/economics , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cost Savings/economics , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Neuronavigation/adverse effects , Neuronavigation/economics , Patient Safety/economics , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Young Adult
11.
Laryngoscope ; 131(11): 2403-2412, 2021 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33851727

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The economic burden of sinusitis is significant, and socioeconomic factors can impact patient decision-making. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of perceived financial insecurity on healthcare decision-making and treatment compliance among sinusitis patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using the 2018 National Health Interview Survey. METHODS: Survey responses to nine questions regarding financial stressors and nine questions regarding cost-saving healthcare actions were recorded, which included seeking lower cost medication, medication noncompliance, and avoiding care visits due to costs. RESULTS: There was a total weighted sample size of 28.9 million patients who self-reported a diagnosis of sinusitis (12% of the U.S. population). Sinusitis patients who reported cost-saving actions had an increased severity of perceived financial insecurity than those without cost-saving actions (P < .001). Sinusitis patients with perceived financial insecurity had the highest odds of at least one cost-saving action (odds ratio [OR] = 5.94, 95% CI = 5.911-5.970, P < .001), followed by lack of health insurance (OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 5.107-5.159, P < .001), and poor self-reported health status (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 2.792-2.822, P < .001). Increasing the number of financial stressors increased the odds of at least one cost-saving action (P < .001). Across all financial stressors, the most commonly performed cost-saving action was asking for lower cost medication. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived financial insecurity is associated with cost-saving healthcare actions among sinusitis patients, including treatment noncompliance. Interventions to assess financial insecurity among sinusitis patients may facilitate shared decision-making for optimal, individualized treatment plans that may lead to improved outcomes and quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:2403-2412, 2021.


Financial Stress/psychology , Insurance, Health/standards , Perception/physiology , Sinusitis/economics , Adult , Aged , Cost Savings/methods , Cost of Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Decision Making, Shared , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Status , Humans , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
12.
Future Oncol ; 17(21): 2735-2745, 2021 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33855863

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death with 9.6 million deaths registered in 2018, of which 70% occur in Africa, Asia and Central and South America, the low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). The global annual expenditure on anticancer medicines increased from $96 billion in 2013 to $133 billion in 2017. This growth rate is several folds that of newly diagnosed cancer cases and therefore estimated to reach up to $200 billion by 2022. The Uganda Cancer Institute, Uganda's national referral cancer center, has increased access to cancer medicines through an efficient and cost-saving procurement system. The system has achieved cost savings of more than USD 2,000,000 on a total of 37 of 42 essential cancer medicines. This has resulted in 85.8% availability superseding the WHO's 80% target. All selected products were procured from manufacturers with stringent regulatory authority approval or a proven track record of quality products.


Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Developing Countries/economics , Drugs, Essential/supply & distribution , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cost Savings/methods , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Drugs, Essential/economics , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Neoplasms/economics , Uganda
13.
J Investig Med ; 69(7): 1372-1376, 2021 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33712521

We performed a retrospective study of cardiology telemedicine visits at a large academic pediatric center between 2016 and 2019 (pre COVID-19). Telemedicine patient visits were matched to data from their previous in-person visits, to evaluate any significant differences in total charge, insurance compensation, patient payment, percent reimbursement and zero reimbursement. Miles were measured between patient's home and the address of previous visit. We found statistically significant differences in mean charges of telemedicine versus in-person visits (2019US$) (172.95 vs 218.27, p=0.0046), patient payment for telemedicine visits versus in-person visits (2019US$) (11.13 vs 62.83, p≤0.001), insurance reimbursement (2019US$) (65.18 vs 110.85, p≤0.001) and insurance reimbursement rate (43% vs 61%, p=0.0029). Rate of zero reimbursement was not different. Mean distance from cardiology clinic was 35 miles. No adverse outcomes were detected. This small retrospective study showed cost reduction and a decrease in travel time for families participating in telemedicine visits. Future work is needed to enhance compensation for telemedicine visits.


Ambulatory Care , Cardiology Service, Hospital , Cardiovascular Diseases , Costs and Cost Analysis , Telemedicine , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiology Service, Hospital/economics , Cardiology Service, Hospital/trends , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Child , Cost Savings/methods , Costs and Cost Analysis/methods , Costs and Cost Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Family Health , Female , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Heart Defects, Congenital/economics , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/economics , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
14.
Birth ; 48(2): 274-282, 2021 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33580537

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 caused significant disruptions to health systems globally; however, restricting the family presence during birth saw an increase in women considering community birth options. This study aimed to quantify the hospital resource savings that could occur if all low-risk women in Australia gave birth at home or in birth centers. METHODS: A whole-of-population linked administrative data set containing all women (n = 44 498) who gave birth in Queensland, Australia, between 01/07/2012 and 30/06/2015 was reweighted to represent all Australian women giving birth in 2017. A static microsimulation model of woman and infant health service resource use was created based on 2017 data. The model was comprised of a base model, representing "current" care, and a counterfactual model, representing hypothetical scenarios where all low-risk Australian women gave birth at home or in birth centers. RESULTS: If all low-risk women gave birth at home in 2017, cesarean rates would have reduced from 13.4% to 2.7%. Similarly, there would have been 860 fewer inpatient bed days and 10.1 fewer hours of women's intensive care unit time per 1000 births. If all women gave birth in birth centers, cesarean rates would have reduced to 6.7%. In addition, over 760 inpatient bed days would have been saved along with 5.6 hours of women's intensive care unit time per 1000 births. CONCLUSIONS: Significant health resource savings could occur by shifting low-risk births from hospitals to home birth and birth center services. Greater examination of Australian women's preferences for home birth and birth center birth models of care is needed.


Birthing Centers , COVID-19 , Health Care Rationing , Home Childbirth , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Birthing Centers/economics , Birthing Centers/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Cost Savings/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Female , Health Care Rationing/methods , Health Care Rationing/statistics & numerical data , Home Childbirth/economics , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Models, Theoretical , Needs Assessment , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2
15.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 27(3): 635-643, 2021 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32539663

INTRODUCTION: Cancer drug therapy costs continue to rise and threaten the sustainability of Canada's public healthcare system. Previous studies have calculated potential savings utilizing different dosing regimens of cancer treatments. Our objectives were to determine the financial impact of drug wastage and to explore cost-effective dosing regimens for pembrolizumab. METHODS: This was a retrospective study reviewing data for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma patients at all six BC Cancer Regional Centres during fiscal years 2017 and 2018. Pembrolizumab waste amounts recorded in pharmacy wastage logs were totalled. Estimates of the number of vials used were compared between vial sharing and non-vial sharing practices to determine the cost differences. Costs for dosing regimens used during fiscal years 2017 and 2018 were compared to 2 mg/kg weight-based dosing (to a maximum of 200 mg), 2 mg/kg dosing rounding down within 5% and 10%, and flat dosing of 200 mg. RESULTS: There were a total of 202 non-small cell lung cancer and 182 melanoma patients with 2948 doses dispensed. Documented wastage was valued at $1,829,047.44 (8.65%) and across all six centres, vial sharing could reduce costs by $3,207,600.00 using the 100 mg vials. Compared to fiscal years 2017 and 2018, 2 mg/kg dosing (to a maximum of 200 mg) was the most cost-effective, decreasing costs by $222,719.20; flat dosing of 200 mg was the most expensive, increasing costs by $6,625,260.40. CONCLUSIONS: Having smaller vial sizes, practicing vial sharing, and using weight-based dosing all improve cost savings. Further investigations on the allocation of resources to optimize drug use and minimize wastage are needed.


Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , British Columbia/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/economics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Cost Savings/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Utilization Review/economics , Drug Utilization Review/methods , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/economics , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/economics , Melanoma/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/economics , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology
16.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 27(6): 361-366, 2020 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33097620

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to review economic data on the use of closed system drug transfer devices (CSTDs) for preparing and administering hazardous drugs, and to evaluate the quality of data reporting as defined by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). METHODS: All references from a recent Cochrane review about CSTDs were evaluated for inclusion. A literature review was also conducted. Articles containing economic data about the use of CSTDs were retained for analysis. Two researchers independently graded the articles according to the 24-item CHEERS checklist. RESULTS: Of the 138 articles identified initially, 12 were retained for analysis. Nine of these studies did not report acquisition costs or did not detail acquisition costs. Six studies reported economic benefits associated with the used of CSTDs, all related to extending the beyond-use date. The mean number of CHEERS criteria fulfilled by the included articles was 9.2 (SD 2.4). CONCLUSIONS: CSTDs are costly to acquire. However, few studies have examined the economic impact of these devices, and the existing studies are incomplete. As a result, hospitals planning to implement these devices will be unable to make a sound economic evaluation. Robust economic evaluation of CSTDs is needed.


Data Interpretation, Statistical , Drug Compounding/economics , Drug Packaging/economics , Hazardous Substances/economics , Cost Savings/methods , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Drug Compounding/methods , Drug Compounding/statistics & numerical data , Drug Packaging/methods , Drug Packaging/statistics & numerical data , Drug Storage/economics , Drug Storage/methods , Drug Storage/statistics & numerical data , Economics, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Hazardous Substances/administration & dosage , Hazardous Substances/chemical synthesis , Humans , Research Design/statistics & numerical data
17.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 117: 104768, 2020 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32861742

Biological medicines have significantly altered treatment for many patients with chronic diseases such as cancers, autoimmune diseases, and diabetes. However, the high cost of biological medicines has limited patients' access to them. Iraq is one of the countries that have decided to increase access to these medicines through biosimilars, which are copies of originator biological medicines. Prior to 2019, the Iraqi National Regulatory Authority (NRA) had no clear guidelines in place for biosimilars uptake. Therefore, approvals of many biosimilars were delayed. As a response to that, a new pivotal committee was found within this authority, and the first version of Iraqi basis and guidelines for the approval of biosimilars was enacted. With the implementation of the Iraqi biosimilars guidelines and escalating the cooperation within the Iraqi NRA, many benefits have been attained in a short time including the approval of many essential biosimilar products which has resulted in a total cost savings estimated to exceed 50 million USD in just the year 2020. However, there are still some barriers towards making the utmost benefit from biosimilars in Iraq, such as lack of familiarity of these products among the Iraqi health care providers which requires appropriate biosimilars-awareness enhancement strategies.


Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/standards , Cost Savings/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacovigilance , Animals , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/economics , Cost Savings/methods , Drug Approval/methods , Humans
18.
J Rehabil Med ; 52(9): jrm00106, 2020 Sep 30.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32778901

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs and monetary benefits of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with Alzheimer's disease in real-world settings. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to determine the most effective treatment strategies for being able to stay at home for patients with Alzheimer's disease. Care-management, family support, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation were identified as effective interventions applicable in the Finnish healthcare setting. Data on medical and social service costs, and the costs of residential care for all patients newly diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in 2 major cities in Finland were analysed in a 4-year follow-up study. The potential cost savings of the different treatment strategies were assessed. RESULTS: The annual cost increased from €9,481 to €28,400 (mean per patient) during the 4-year follow-up. Cost savings were achieved in care-management, family support programmes, and rehabil-itative cognitive and social activation if the patients' transition to long-term care was delayed by 2.8, 1.8 and 43.0 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Care-management and informal caregiver support for patients with Alzheimer's disease may benefit patients and result in concurrent cost savings. Delaying the decline in cognitive and social functioning through rehabilitation is indicated for more severe phases of Alzheimer's disease, and the costs appear to be compensated by savings in the cost of long-term care.


Alzheimer Disease/economics , Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Cost Savings/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Finland , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
19.
Milbank Q ; 98(3): 908-974, 2020 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32820837

Policy Points Evidence suggests that bundled payment contracting can slow the growth of payer costs relative to fee-for-service contracting, although bundled payment models may not reduce absolute costs. Bundled payments may be more effective than fee-for-service payments in containing costs for certain medical conditions. For the most part, Medicare's bundled payment initiatives have not been associated with a worsening of quality in terms of readmissions, emergency department use, and mortality. Some evidence suggests a worsening of other quality measures for certain medical conditions. Bundled payment contracting involves trade-offs: Expanding a bundle's scope and duration may better contain costs, but a more comprehensive bundle may be less attractive to providers, reducing their willingness to accept it as an alternative to fee-for-service payment. CONTEXT: Bundled payments have been promoted as an alternative to fee-for-service payments that can mitigate the incentives for service volume under the fee-for-service model. As Medicare has gained experience with bundled payments, it has widened their scope and increased their duration. However, there have been few reviews of the empirical literature on the impact of Medicare's bundled payment programs on cost, resource use, utilization, and quality. METHODS: We examined the history and features of 16 of Medicare's bundled payment programs involving hospital-initiated episodes of care and conducted a literature review of articles about those programs. Database and additional searches yielded 1,479 articles. We evaluate the studies' methodological quality and summarize the quantitative findings about Medicare expenditures and quality of care from 37 studies that used higher-quality research designs. FINDINGS: Medicare's bundled payment initiatives have varied in their design features, such as episode scope and duration. Many initiatives were associated with little to no reduction in Medicare expenditures, unless large pricing discounts for providers were negotiated in advance. Initiatives that included post-acute care services were associated with lower expenditures for certain conditions. Hospitals may have been able to reduce internal production costs with help from physicians via gainsharing. Most initiatives were not associated with significant changes in quality of care, as measured by readmission and mortality rates. Of the significant changes in readmission rates, the results were mixed, showing increases and decreases associated with bundled payments. Some evidence suggested that worse patient outcomes were associated bundled payments, although most results were not statistically significant. Results on case-mix selection were mixed: Several initiatives were associated with reductions in episode severity, whereas others were associated with little change. CONCLUSIONS: Bundled payments for hospital-initiated episodes may be a good alternative to fee-for-service payments. Bundled payments can help slow the growth of payer spending, although they do not necessarily reduce absolute spending. They are associated with lower provider production costs, and there is no overwhelming evidence of compromised quality. However, designing a bundled payment contract that is attractive to both providers and payers proves to be a challenge.


Hospitalization/economics , Medicare/economics , Patient Care Bundles/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms , Cost Savings/economics , Cost Savings/methods , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs/organization & administration , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/organization & administration , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Bundles/statistics & numerical data , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/statistics & numerical data , United States
20.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 40(8): e780-e784, 2020 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32604349

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine injuries (CSI) have the potential to cause severe morbidity in children. Multiple imaging studies are used during evaluation of CSIs but come at a cost, both financially and in radiation exposure. To reduce resource utilization and radiation exposure, we implemented the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group (PCSCWG) standardized protocol (SP) for evaluating CSIs in children. METHODS: Children below 18 years old presenting with concern for CSI at a level 1 pediatric trauma center were reviewed before (July 2015 to May 2016) and after (November 2017 to June 2018) protocol implementation. Demographics, injuries, and imaging utilization were extracted. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients cleared with clinical exam, and the proportion undergoing x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance image. The secondary outcome was the estimated difference in imaging charges based on the annual reduction in radiographic studies. RESULTS: During the study 359 children were evaluated for CSIs (248 pre-SP, 111 post-SP). Patients were similar with respect to age, injury severity score, and mechanism of injury. Protocol adherence was 87.4%. The prevalence of CSI was similar in the preprotocol and postprotocol cohorts (2.8% vs. 1.8%, P=0.567). Children treated after protocol implementation were significantly more likely to be cleared by clinical exam (15.3% vs. 43.2%, P<0.001). Significantly fewer children had x-rays (70.2% vs. 55.0%, P=0.005) and computed tomography scans (14.5% vs. 5.4%, P=0.013) in the postprotocol period. There was no difference in the utilization of magnetic resonance image (6.9% vs. 7.2%, P=0.904) or the proportion of children discharged with a cervical collar (10.1% vs. 12.6%, P=0.476). No patients in either group were found to have a previously undiagnosed injury at follow-up. The reduction in radiographic studies translates to an estimated annual reduction in imaging charges of $396,476. CONCLUSIONS: The PCSCWG protocol for evaluating CSIs reduced the number of radiographic studies performed and estimated imaging charges while reliably identifying CSIs.


Cervical Vertebrae , Clinical Protocols/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Spinal Injuries/diagnosis , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Child , Cost Savings/methods , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Pediatrics/methods , Pediatrics/standards , Pilot Projects , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Radiologic Health/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
...